REGULATION #38 STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS and WATER QUALITY STANDARDS

REGION: 3 and 4
               
BASIN: Upper South Platte River	
Desig	
Classifications	
NUMERIC STANDARDS	
TEMPORARY
MODIFICATIONS
AND
QUALIFIERS

	
	
PHYSICAL
and
BIOLOGICAL	
INORGANIC

mg/l	
METALS

g/l
		
	. . . .

14.	Mainstem of the South Platte River from the outlet of Chatfield Reservoir to the Burlington Ditch diversion in Denver, Colorado.	
	Aq Life Warm 1
Recreation E
Water Supply
Agriculture	T=TVS(WS-I) oC
summer=14 Feb-Nov
D.O.=5.0 mg/l
pH=6.5-9.0
E. Coli=126/100ml	NH3(ac/ch)=TVS
Cl2(ac)=0.019
Cl2(ch)=0.011
CN=0.005	S=0.002
B=0.75
NO2=0.5
NO3=10
Cl=250
S04=WS	As(ac)=340
As(ch)=0.02 (Trec)
Cd(ac/ch)=TVS
CrIII(ac)=50(Trec)
CrVI(ac/ch)=TVS
Cu(ac/ch)=TVS
Fe(ch)=WS(dis)	Fe(ch)=1000(Trec)
Pb(ac/ch)=TVS
Mn(ch)=190(dis)
Mn(ac/ch)=TVS
Hg(ch)=0.01(Tot)
Ni(ac/ch)=TVS	Se(ac/ch)=TVS
Ag(ac/ch)=TVS
Zn(ac/ch)=TVS	Temporary modifications:  Cu(ac/ch)=TVSx2.7 (Type iii). Applies below the confluence with Marcy Gulch. Expiration date of 12/31/2015.
T=current conditions (Type iii).
Expiration date of 12/31/2015.
Se(ac/ch)=current conditions (Type iii).  Expiration date of 12/31/2013.
As(ch)=0.02-3.0(Trec)
Expiration date of 12/13/12.	
		. . . .

38.79	FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF ADOPTION OF EMERGENCY REVISIONS TO REGULATION NO. 38, CLASSIFICATIONS AND NUMERIC STANDARDS FOR SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, LARAMIE RIVER BASIN REPUBLICAN RIVER BASIN, SMOKY HILL RIVER BASIN (5 CCR 1002-38)
Pursuant to sections 25-8-208, 25-8-402(5), and 24-4-103(6), C.R.S., the Commission adopted a revision to Regulation No. 38, Classifications and Numeric Standards for South Platte River Basin, Laramie River Basin Republican River Basin, Smoky Hill River Basin on December 13, 2011.
The Colorado Department of Transportation (“CDOT”), the Regional Transportation district (“RTD”) and the City and County of Denver (“Denver”), requested an emergency adoption of a revision to the water- plus- fish  arsenic standard for Segment 14 of the Upper South Platte River Basin in order to facilitate the issuance of Colorado Discharge Permit System (CDPS) permits to segment 14 with chronic arsenic effluent limitations that are achievable with current and reasonable treatment capabilities.  
In August of 2005 the Commission adopted revisions to the Basic Standards and Methodologies for Surface Waters (Regulation #31) to add a water-plus-fish table value standard of for chronic arsenic of 0.02 micrograms per liter (µg/L).  Water- plus- fish standards are numeric human health-based water quality standards that are calculated protective values that take into account the combined exposure from the pollutant in drinking water and the pollutant accumulated in fish flesh.  This criterion was generally adopted for water bodies with drinking water and aquatic life class 1 use designations in the basin hearings between 2006 and 2009. 
The proposal on December 13, 2011 was to revise the water- plus- fish water quality standard for arsenic on Segment 14 from 0.02 micrograms per liter (µg/L) to a range of 0.02 –7.6 µg/L.   The Division proposed the revision to the chronic arsenic standard for Segment 14 based on circumstances where entities that have been assigned chronic arsenic effluent limitations in a CDPS permit at or near the 0.02 µg/L cannot achieve their chronic arsenic effluent limitations with treatment that may be beyond the current reasonable limit of technology.  The Division examined the basis for the water- plus- fish standard and provided the Commission a policy option for an alternate water plus fish table value standard for chronic arsenic that it believed would be protective of human health for Segment 14 (7.6 is below the Safe Drinking Water Act protective level of 10 µg/L).  Testimony was presented that as a practical matter, 3.0 µg/L is the lowest level that is technologically achievable.  Testimony was also presented that there is uncertainty regarding the arsenic level necessary to protect  the water plus fish use and regarding the extent to which the arsenic levels are reversible (i.e., whether the levels in the ground water and the river are natural or human-induced irreversible).  
As a matter of policy, the Commission has decided that since the technologically achievable arsenic level is less stringent than the calculated W+F criterion, the W+F criterion for segment 14 will be a hybrid, based on a range of 0.02-3.0 µg/L.  The first number in the range shall be the strictly health-based value, based on the Commission’s established methodology for human health-based standards that protect against the combined exposure of drinking water and eating fish.  The second number in the range is the technologically achievable value of 3.0 µg/L.  The Commission adopted this revision in the form of a temporary modification in recognition of the uncertainty regarding use-protective values and achievability.  The temporary modification has an expiration date of December 12, 2012.
Control requirements, such as discharge permits effluent limitations, shall be established using the first number in the range as the ambient water quality target, provided that no effluent limitation shall require an “end of pipe” discharge level more restrictive than the second number in the range during the effective period for this temporary modification.  
The Commission found that the revision was necessary since achieving arsenic discharge permit limitations that result from the current arsenic standard appears to be technologically unachievable.  CDOT, RTD, and the City and County of Denver (CCD) have expended significant public funds for multiple projects administered by these entities in attempting to comply with the limits.
Therefore, the Commission has determined that emergency adoption of the temporary modification of the chronic arsenic standard for Segment 14 is appropriate under these specific circumstances.  The Commission finds that these amount to exigent circumstances which warrant emergency adoption of these revisions to the relevant water quality standards pursuant to section 25-8-208.  The Commission further finds that these emergency revisions are imperatively necessary to preserve public health and welfare and that compliance with the procedural requirements of section 24-4-103, C.R.S., resulting in further delay, would be contrary to the public interest. 
These revisions shall be effective December 13, 2011 and shall remain in effect until the effective date of permanent regulations or one year, whichever comes first.  The Commission intends to reconsider this issue in its August 2012 rulemaking proceedings.  The Division shall develop a proposal that the Commission will consider for notice in April 2012.